[p2pu-webcraft] [p2pu-schools] Re: Please review: default decline message for non Webcraft courses and groups

[Jessica Ledbetter]

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:54 PM, John Britton <public at johndbritton.com>wrote:

> I totally agree Ali, declining people is bad. They should be invited in to
> Schools
>
>
+1

I think admin at p2pu is emailed when new courses are created. Can maybe cc
school organizers (if they're not on the admin list already) for a stopgap
till we get tags.

Also a group organizer can ping the school in question in case her/his group
is missed. Then it'd be handy to have a version of this email probably.


> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Alison Jean Cole <
> alisonjean.cole at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Agree with Jessy's feedback.
>>
>> *My hope is that denial will be a temporary process until we have a good
>> tagging system in place.*
>>
>> Schools could then review courses tagged with their topics and invite them
>> to join the school. I would remove "select a school" from the course
>> creation process and replace it with tags. That way we avoid having a
>> negative system in place altogether.
>>
>>
>> ALISON
>> p2pu.org/en/alison/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Jessy Kate Schingler <
>> jessy at jessykate.com> wrote:
>>
>>> i think it was for p2pu as a whole. i do like the idea that people who
>>> have questions could contact an individual person directly with their
>>> concerns or questions.
>>>
>>> Jessy
>>> --
>>> http://jessykate.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Pippa Buchanan <
>>> Pippa.Buchanan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> great feedback from jessy - but I accidentally deferred the message in
>>>> the moderation filter. sorry jessy!
>>>>
>>>> switching the order of the explanation makes sense - thanks for pointing
>>>> that out!
>>>>
>>>> re volunteer course mentors - i recall us discussing it, but it didn't
>>>> go much further then that. Was this meant to be a general P2PU approach or
>>>> SoW specific?  Once we've got tags in place we'll also be able to point
>>>> organisers towards many other organsiers working on similar topics.
>>>>
>>>> P*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Jessy Kate Schingler <jessy at jessykate.com>
>>>> To: "School of Webcraft (Sow)" <p2pu-webcraft at lists.p2pu.org>
>>>> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:43:49 -0400
>>>> Subject: Re: [p2pu-webcraft] Please review: default decline message for
>>>> non Webcraft courses and groups
>>>> cool :) here's a couple thoughts:
>>>>
>>>> i would put the description about SoW and what differentiates it from
>>>> p2pu *before* your decline statement, so that when you say, "it doesn't fit"
>>>> you've already given the context for why.
>>>>
>>>> also when you say "let the community know" i would have a link to an
>>>> individual person, as well a link to the mailing list. otherwise "community"
>>>> seems a bit vague. i imagine many people won';t want to join a mailing list
>>>> just to worksop their topic and if that's the only option, we might lose
>>>> them, so having a human is useful IMHO.
>>>>
>>>> didn't we discuss the idea of having volunteer course mentors/contacts?
>>>>
>>>> Jessy
>>>> --
>>>> http://jessykate.com
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> p2pu-webcraft mailing list
>>>>
>>>> p2pu-webcraft at lists.p2pu.org
>>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-webcraft
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> p2pu-webcraft mailing list
>>> p2pu-webcraft at lists.p2pu.org
>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-webcraft
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2pu-webcraft mailing list
> p2pu-webcraft at lists.p2pu.org
> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-webcraft
>
>


-- 
Jessica Ledbetter
http://jessicaledbetter.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-webcraft/attachments/20110622/8cbe0622/attachment.html>