[p2pu-dev] [p2pu-community] Re: Revamping the community call

[Rebecca Kahn]

Brilliant. Thanks for all the feedback, folks. I've taken note of
everyone's choices, and am putting together a plan for this week's call,
which I'll circulate with the community a bit later today.

Onward and upward with better calls! Yay!

B

On 17 September 2012 22:57, Jane Park <janepark at p2pu.org> wrote:

> I like Alison's idea too. The School of Open working call is currently
> scheduled for once a month after the P2PU community call (first Thursday),
> so would love to align so it's the same day/times going forward.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Alan Webb <alancwebb at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Combo 1 & 2 sounds great to me too Rebecca...
>>
>> Also, we talked about a close relative to option 2 this summer--- let
>> community members propose and organize calls on any topic, whenever, and
>> share / promote a weekly schedule of calls through a shared calendar, blog,
>> and this listserv once a week or even once a month?
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Alison Cole <alison at p2pu.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Combo 1 & 2:
>>>
>>> Have a once a month staff call.
>>>
>>> Have a once a month P2PU Projects call.
>>>
>>> Alternate them so every two weeks there's something going on.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Rebecca Kahn <bekka at p2pu.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello good people
>>>>
>>>> I think we'd all agree the community call is not exactly amazing at the
>>>> moment. This is not a reflection on any of us, but just a natural evolution
>>>> of an organisation and its tools. I know the call is an important part of
>>>> our open governance process, but it's probably time we evolved the call.
>>>>
>>>> So, I'd like to propose a couple of options, and ask for your Green
>>>> (love the idea, yes yes yes)  Orange (hang on, I have some questions) and
>>>> Red (Ugh, this stinks and here's why...) opinions.
>>>>
>>>> 1. We scrap the call as it stands, and replace it with an every-2 weeks
>>>> staff call that is open to anyone who wants to listen. To add an item to
>>>> the agenda, you have to have done some prep and sent your idea before the
>>>> meetings. Adding to the agenda on the day is not an option. This call will
>>>> be under an hour and notes circulated to all.
>>>>
>>>> 2. We scrap the call and replace it with a once-a-month seminar type
>>>> event where people present pitches, progress reports, research feedback,
>>>> special guest stars.
>>>>
>>>> 3. A combination of 1 & 2
>>>>
>>>> 4. Everything stays the same. The call is set in stone, for perpetuity.
>>>>
>>>> Other options and thoughts would be welcome, but we'd like to enact
>>>> this from this week, so less discussion = a happier community call sooner.
>>>>
>>>> B
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Alison
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "P2PU
>>> Community" group. Please stick to the ground rules:
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/p2pu-community/web/ground-rules
>>>
>>> Specific topics such as research, web development and course design are
>>> discussed in separate working groups:
>>> http://wiki.p2pu.org/mailing-lists
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "P2PU
>> Community" group. Please stick to the ground rules:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/p2pu-community/web/ground-rules
>>
>> Specific topics such as research, web development and course design are
>> discussed in separate working groups:
>> http://wiki.p2pu.org/mailing-lists
>>
>
>
>
> --
> School of Open
> http://schoolofopen.org
>
> Latest news: http://info.p2pu.org/tag/school-of-open
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "P2PU
> Community" group. Please stick to the ground rules:
> http://groups.google.com/group/p2pu-community/web/ground-rules
>
> Specific topics such as research, web development and course design are
> discussed in separate working groups:
> http://wiki.p2pu.org/mailing-lists
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20120918/f9364d17/attachment-0001.html>