[p2pu-dev] A long way to go for sorting tasks

[zuzel.vp]

It should be ok if we make the ajax call for the update event:
http://jqueryui.com/demos/sortable/#event-update

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Jos Flores <josmasflores at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi there, this is great!
> I'd personally rather have the saving process be automatic. If you
> need an extra button it will have to be very explicit, or having the
> page warn you if you are navigating away without saving. Could go for
> the easier option first, see how it works, and if it really is
> inefficient, then go for the more complex one.
>
> cheers,
> José
>
>
> On 27 March 2012 03:52, VampB <vampireb at gmail.com> wrote:
> >     As John suggested, I have created a branch at
> > https://github.com/platvampb/lernanta/compare/test_task_drag_drop, which
> > contains only the front-end code to demonstrate a basic sortable task
> list.
> > Please try it and give feedback!
> >     I also want some advice for the next step. The simpler implementation
> > would be to make an ajax call for each sorting action, which can be
> > inefficient if we expect users to do a lot of sorting. A slightly more
> > complex way would be using cookies to store sorting order before user
> clicks
> > a button and submit the sorted list. Let me know what you think.
> >     Thank you.
> >
> > Bo.Zhang
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 8:52 AM, John Britton <john at p2pu.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Definitely go for it. Maybe set up a static HTML demo and share how it
> >> works here before you make the backend changes that you need.
> >>
> >> --
> >> contact info:
> >> http://www.johndbritton.com
> >> @johndbritton - http://twitter.com/johndbritton
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Jos Flores <josmasflores at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Ticket is still open and I don't see any pull requests so you I'd say
> >>> it's ll yours :)
> >>>
> >>>
> http://p2pu.lighthouseapp.com/projects/71002/tickets/97-drag-and-drop-reordering-of-tasks
> >>>
> >>> cheers,
> >>> José
> >>>
> >>> On 15 March 2012 01:47, VampB <vampireb at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > Hey guys, so what's the status on this request? I'd like to take a
> stab
> >>> > if
> >>> > no one is working on it.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:34 AM, John Britton <john at p2pu.org> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> @Paul - It looked like you were keen on getting started with this.
> Let
> >>> >> me
> >>> >> know if I can be of any help, would love to get this feature from a
> >>> >> volunteer contributor.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> --
> >>> >> contact info:
> >>> >> http://www.johndbritton.com
> >>> >> @johndbritton - http://twitter.com/johndbritton
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Maria Droujkova <
> droujkova at gmail.com>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Dan, be nice. The task is in the development queue now, with
> changed
> >>> >>> priority.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Speaking of which: where do I look to find the answer to my
> burning,
> >>> >>> "Are
> >>> >>> we there yet?" questions, such as when the developers will start
> >>> >>> working on
> >>> >>> a task, or the estimated time? I thought I knew the answer, but I
> >>> >>> can't find
> >>> >>> the info there.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Cheers,
> >>> >>> Maria Droujkova
> >>> >>> 919-388-1721
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Make math your own, to make your own math
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Dan Diebolt <dandiebolt at gmail.com>
> >>> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> The real problem is not related to the user interface but rather
> >>> >>>> that
> >>> >>>> there needs to be underlying support in the platform for
> sequencing
> >>> >>>> tasks.
> >>> >>>> Implementing this would take many more than two dozen cookies
> >>> >>>> because the
> >>> >>>> hive is fixated on trending fads and gamification rather than
> >>> >>>> platform
> >>> >>>> features and content development.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> >>> p2pu-dev mailing list
> >>> >>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> >>> >>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>> >> p2pu-dev mailing list
> >>> >> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> >>> >> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > p2pu-dev mailing list
> >>> > p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> >>> > http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
> >>> >
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> p2pu-dev mailing list
> >>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> >>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> p2pu-dev mailing list
> >> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> >> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > p2pu-dev mailing list
> > p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> > http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20120330/2796072b/attachment.html>