[p2pu-dev] Getting started with Lernanta (cont.)

[Ricardo Soares]

Hey Dirk!

Fantastic! I prefer the one with many hands for a "contributor" badge. I
agree with José with adding an extra text to the badges; maybe "P2PU"
should be enough :)
Nice work!


On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Jos Flores <josmasflores at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Dirk, they look great!
> Personally I would go with the one with many hands for contributor.
>
> Should the contributor and translator ones be specific to Lernanta (or
> P2PU)? Not sure myself... the open source one feels like it is more
> generic and fits well, but the other two feel like more specific to
> the particular project... maybe adding 'Lernanta' or 'P2PU' to the
> text? dunno... cause anyone that creates or participates in a group is
> contributing to P2PU, but not necessarily to Lernanta (this particular
> challenge)... what you guys think?
>
> cheers,
> José
>
>
> On 19 April 2012 12:55, Dirk Uys <dirk at p2pu.org> wrote:
> > Here are a few drafts for badge icons! Let me know what you think?
> >
> > d
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Dirk Uys <dirk at p2pu.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Current draft is at http://pad.p2pu.org/p/contributing_to_lernanta, but
> >> I'll let everyone know once I have the icons :)
> >>
> >> Any suggestions in the mean time will be welcomed!
> >>
> >> d
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Alison Cole <alison at p2pu.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I think badge creation is pretty easy, and Dirk you have the tools to
> >>> implement them. You'll need to identify your badge, develop a rubric
> for
> >>> peer assessment and draft up a little icon.
> >>>
> >>> Let me know if you need a hand. I believe Zuzel is the keeper of the
> >>> technical information.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Jos Flores <josmasflores at gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> guys, yes, more than one badge would make sense in this context;
> >>>> definitely a contributor to Lernanta or P2PU would be great, and other
> >>>> badges more oriented towards open source would be cool too.
> >>>>
> >>>> cheers,
> >>>> José
> >>>>
> >>>> On 16 April 2012 16:39, Alison Cole <alison at p2pu.org> wrote:
> >>>> > I would love to see a "contributor badge" created for this, amongst
> >>>> > others.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Dirk Uys <dirk at p2pu.org> wrote:
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Jos Flores <
> josmasflores at gmail.com>
> >>>> >> wrote:
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> The problem is that, as it is now, there is no sense of closure,
> and
> >>>> >>> may affect achievement feelings too, and complicate badges too...
> >>>> >>> would you just click as finished a bunch of tasks that you have
> not
> >>>> >>> attempted (cause they are not part of your path)? What badge would
> >>>> >>> you
> >>>> >>> associate with the whole course?
> >>>> >>> Also, if you want to adopt the challenge at the end, and offer
> your
> >>>> >>> help... would that be for both paths?
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Agreed. Currently I would suggest just checking the tasks that is
> not
> >>>> >> applicable to the person completing the challenge. Completing a
> task
> >>>> >> just to
> >>>> >> complete the challenge doesn't make sense. Like experimenting with
> >>>> >> the code
> >>>> >> if you only want to translate. I'm not saying that you won't get
> >>>> >> anything
> >>>> >> from doing that, just that you shouldn't be forced.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> I like the 'choose your own adventure'! That is what learning is
> like
> >>>> >> for
> >>>> >> me:) But I guess that complicates completion - when is your
> adventure
> >>>> >> over?
> >>>> >> Only you can decide when your adventure is over.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> I don't know what badges a user should get automatically when
> >>>> >> completing
> >>>> >> all the tasks?
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Badges like "Open source contributor" should be applied for and
> >>>> >> awarded
> >>>> >> based on evidence of contribution.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> We should consider badges for translators and other interested
> >>>> >> parties?
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Cheers
> >>>> >> d
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>>> >> p2pu-dev mailing list
> >>>> >> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> >>>> >> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > --
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Alison
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > _______________________________________________
> >>>> > p2pu-dev mailing list
> >>>> > p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> >>>> > http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
> >>>> >
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
> >>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> >>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Alison
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> p2pu-dev mailing list
> >>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> >>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > p2pu-dev mailing list
> > p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> > http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>



-- 
Cumprimentos,
Ricardo Soares
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20120419/40432ad1/attachment.html>