[p2pu-dev] users are starting to create "challenges"
Jessica Ledbetter
jessica at jessicaledbetter.com
Thu Oct 6 15:46:06 UTC 2011
But we used to be able to select "Other" and then could write-in things like
"Seminar" or "Workshop" or something that was more fitting for what we were
doing. I don't think we have any of those right now but that was something
I, as a user, was thinking of making.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 8:40 AM, zuzel.vp <zuzel.vp at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ali,
>
> I thought I already clarified this before. Will try to describe the
> change again. Let me know if I am missing something.
>
> The other option was not removed to make place for challenges. The
> other option was replaced by a different implementation to not
> restrict users to only be able to use the study groups functionality
> when creating other learning project.
>
> Before users select an other radio button and filled out a new term
> and short description, and we then made the othe group work like a
> study group and replaced its name (i.e. Study Group) by the provided
> term.
>
> Now they can choose study group, course or challenge and provide a new
> term short description, and we then make the group work like whatever
> they selected and replace the name (i.e. Study Group, Course,
> Challenge) by the provided term.
>
> Users with a DIY U learning plan should not be affected since
> selecting study group and providing a new term works exactly as the
> previous functionality they were using.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Zuzel
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Alison Cole <alison at p2pu.org> wrote:
> > We were using the "other" option for users in DIY U to create personal
> > learning plans. This option was over-rided to make way for challenges.
> Now
> > users in DIY U have no way to hack the P2PU site to create a personal
> > learning plan. This is a problem for us.
> >
> > ALISON
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 7:02 AM, zuzel.vp <zuzel.vp at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Right now there is nothing webcraft specific hardcoded in the
> >> implementation. Hidding the creation will complicate things a bit more
> >> at the implementation level. It will also not allow people to test the
> >> new kind of group (without using the actual webmaking 101 challenges
> >> as sandbox for testing). If we are moving towards it (i.e. some of the
> >> features could become a main part of p2pu), I think it is important to
> >> have challenges as an option. We even made use of this capability in
> >> the first community call by sugesting one of the participants to test
> >> out this kind of group for Bio 101. If challenges were not open at
> >> that time I will had to manually give that user special access or we
> >> will not be able to test them at all. Changing between kinds of groups
> >> is easy so they can change back the group to study group or course
> >> any time. I will vote to include something like (new) in the desc of
> >> the kind of group and start their longer description at help.p2pu.org.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Thanks,
> >> Zuzel
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Philipp Schmidt <philipp at p2pu.org>
> wrote:
> >> > I've noticed that there is at least one new challenge that was created
> >> > by a
> >> > user:
> >> > http://p2pu.org/en/groups/how-to-make-screencasts/
> >> > Since we are really driving development of the challenge UX to support
> >> > webcraft, it might not really work for public challenges (yet). Of
> >> > course
> >> > that's where we want to get to in the future.
> >> > Maybe for now, we should let users know that they are working with an
> >> > experimental "study group type" or even hide the option to create them
> >> > challegnes from non-admin users.
> >> > Thoughts?
> >> > P
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> p2pu-dev mailing list
> >> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> >> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Alison
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > p2pu-dev mailing list
> > p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> > http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>
--
Jessica Ledbetter
http://jessicaledbetter.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20111006/edc6b419/attachment.html>
More information about the p2pu-dev
mailing list