[p2pu-dev] Suggestion for developemnt process
Jessica Ledbetter
jessica at jessicaledbetter.com
Fri May 20 15:44:03 UTC 2011
Fantastic! Thank you :)
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:00 AM, zuzel.vp <zuzel.vp at gmail.com> wrote:
> https://github.com/p2pu/lernanta/wiki/alpha.p2pu.org
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:41 PM, John Britton <public at johndbritton.com> wrote:
>> I would like to set up a CI environment in the future, especially so that it
>> is easy for new contributors to test their work and know that it passes.
>> Right now this may not be top priority, but I do see it as fairly high on
>> the list.
>> I'm on board for creating dev.p2pu.org or similar to continue pushing out
>> new features for testing on non-prod data. In the future I would like to see
>> us roll out features as configurable roll-outs. I'll write more on this
>> subject when it becomes relevant.
>> --
>> contact info:
>> http://www.johndbritton.com
>> @johndbritton - http://twitter.com/johndbritton
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 4:17 PM, zuzel.vp <zuzel.vp at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Lets try out the Thursday feature freeze (midnight EST) to see how it
>>> goes. The rest of the time after Thursday we can concentrate on small
>>> fixes and translation. I will try to setup a basic alpha.p2pu.org (not
>>> the full setup like in production -- and we can improve it in the
>>> following milestones) so people that does not have a dev environment
>>> setup can try out things before Monday.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>> Zuzel
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Jessica Ledbetter
>>> <jessica at jessicaledbetter.com> wrote:
>>> > Would we like to try out a new coding/testing schedule this milestone?
>>> > If so, the first week is almost up.
>>> >
>>> > I've started filing bugs on the current code in github (and looks like
>>> > Zuzel and Vladimir have knocked them out -- awesome!). I put them as
>>> > 0.6 milestone so that we can fix the dev bugs before going into
>>> > production. Does that work alright? Or should we do a more sprint
>>> > mentality where we all focus on finding/fixing bugs at the same time?
>>> >
>>> > I have a few tasks to do this weekend then can focus on finding/fixing
>>> > bugs introduced in 0.6 or continue new "functionality."
>>> >
>>> > For what it's worth, I love the idea of an alpha/staging server that
>>> > exposes the release before the release so that people can test. Can
>>> > we?
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:54 PM, zuzel.vp <zuzel.vp at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> We just have django tests -->
>>> >> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/testing/
>>> >>
>>> >> At this point i think a CI server is an overkill but in the future
>>> >> when the project grows it will be nice to have it.
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Zuzel
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Nadeem Shabir <ns at talis.com> wrote:
>>> >>> Zuzel what level of automated testing do we have at the moment?
>>> >>> I'm a little out of sync with our current development process ... but
>>> >>> ...
>>> >>> Should the development process not be tied into / supported by a
>>> >>> continuous
>>> >>> integration process? I.e. every check in into trunk is checked out by
>>> >>> a CI
>>> >>> server that builds, deploys, and runs any automated tests. Should we
>>> >>> be
>>> >>> aiming to have a suite of unit tests, and a suite of acceptance or
>>> >>> more
>>> >>> functional tests written in something like Selenium that verifies that
>>> >>> the
>>> >>> application is working consistently across different browsers. I've
>>> >>> been
>>> >>> using tools like SauceLabs to run a Selenium based test suite against
>>> >>> multiple browser and os versions - and the net result is all developer
>>> >>> checkins are tested automatically by the build server, which obviously
>>> >>> means
>>> >>> releases can then be deployed to live with confidence.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 11 May 2011 10:15, Philipp Schmidt <phi.schmidt at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On 11 May 2011 03:49, John Britton <public at johndbritton.com> wrote:
>>> >>>> > This is part of the argument against moving to the new site
>>> >>>> > earlier. I'm
>>> >>>> > not
>>> >>>> > opposed, but because we're going to have more and more real users
>>> >>>> > on the
>>> >>>> > new
>>> >>>> > site we'll have to spend a fair amount of time making sure things
>>> >>>> > work
>>> >>>> > before we push them. The alternative is to be ready to fix things
>>> >>>> > if
>>> >>>> > they
>>> >>>> > are broken after we push them (I tend to prefer this approach).
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I suspect the right solution is somewhere in the middle. The old site
>>> >>>> is really starting to hurt us, and it would be great if we could move
>>> >>>> sooner rather than later. But I agree with John that we don't want to
>>> >>>> slow down development too much, and we also don't want real users to
>>> >>>> get frustrated by serious bugs. Could we keep pushing (push-then-fix)
>>> >>>> for now, and start increasing the testing / staging phase by a day at
>>> >>>> a time as we take on more users?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> It might also be useful to have an alpha.p2pu.org where those with
>>> >>>> interest and time, could always access the latest snapshot of
>>> >>>> development progress, and help test.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> P
>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> >>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> >>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> >>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> >>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> >> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> >> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Jessica Ledbetter
>>> > http://jessicaledbetter.com
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> > p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> > http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>
--
Jessica Ledbetter
http://jessicaledbetter.com
More information about the p2pu-dev
mailing list