[p2pu-dev] p2pu question

[Claire Bangser]

That sounds like it could work for us just fine... I was just trying to
understand and explore our options. Let me know if you end up thinking of
other ways to do this... otherwise we'll just use language to distinguish.
Thanks!
Claire

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Alan Webb <alancwebb at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think you could do that most easily just with the language you use
> probably.  In other words, accept as many people you want as participants
> and announce dates for calls for that smaller group on the wall anyway, just
> making clear that those calls only pertain to a subset of the people who are
> contributors.  Do you think that could work?
>
> Either way, I'm copying the P2PU dev listserv to highlight your question as
> a unique use case for how new users might want to use the follow and
> participate options.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Claire Bangser <cjbangser at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> it would be great if lots of people could contribute on the wall/answer
>> questions and tasks, but only a handful of people were part of a smaller
>>  group that we have calls with every 2 weeks or so...
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Alan Webb <alancwebb at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Everything's possible... what would the two tiers be?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Claire Bangser <cjbangser at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> yep! thanks! is there any way to create 2 tiers of participants?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Alan Webb <alancwebb at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey Claire,
>>>>>
>>>>> Followers get updates about new things that appear on the wall, but
>>>>> cannot contribute.  Participants get updates and can also contribute.  Does
>>>>> that help?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Claire Bangser <cjbangser at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> hey alan - quick p2pu question -- can followers contribute to the wall
>>>>>> and respond to tasks if they want? or only participants? just want to make
>>>>>> sure im using the right terminology on teh description.
>>>>>> thanks!
>>>>>> claire
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20110610/5401ebdc/attachment.html>