[p2pu-dev] another argument for a "webmaster" group
Philipp Schmidt
phi.schmidt at gmail.com
Fri Jun 3 12:33:29 UTC 2011
On 3 June 2011 12:46, Nadeem Shabir <ns at talis.com> wrote:
> Philipp,
>
> What was it that prompted him to post this?
> If he's saying that p2pu said that flash911 is not a group we need, then
> presumably he feels that was communicated to him by someone?
>
> Are you aware of , or can you provide any context around this?
>
I saw a general mention about a flash course on the webcraft list, but
believe that the main communication happened between Pippa and him off list.
However, I am pretty sure that Pippa would have made it clear that while the
course might not fit into School of Webcraft, it would be very welcome as a
P2PU course. So, it's probably a matter of clarifying that - but would be
useful if I (Alison, Pippa, Bekka, etc.) could do that on his course home
page so that others don't get confused.
-- P
>
> cheers
> N
>
> On 3 June 2011 10:04, Philipp Schmidt <phi.schmidt at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> http://new.p2pu.org/en/groups/flash-911/
>>
>> I'd love to be able to reply to his comment that "the p2pu has said that
>> flash911 is not a kind of study group they need here." It's not only not
>> true, but it also makes us sound like we are not nice people.
>>
>> Users with webmaster should be allowed to participate/comment in any of
>> the groups.
>>
>> -- P
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20110603/558deffa/attachment.html>
More information about the p2pu-dev
mailing list