[p2pu-dev] another argument for a "webmaster" group
Nadeem Shabir
ns at talis.com
Fri Jun 3 10:46:25 UTC 2011
Philipp,
What was it that prompted him to post this?
If he's saying that p2pu said that flash911 is not a group we need, then
presumably he feels that was communicated to him by someone?
Are you aware of , or can you provide any context around this?
cheers
N
On 3 June 2011 10:04, Philipp Schmidt <phi.schmidt at gmail.com> wrote:
> http://new.p2pu.org/en/groups/flash-911/
>
> I'd love to be able to reply to his comment that "the p2pu has said that
> flash911 is not a kind of study group they need here." It's not only not
> true, but it also makes us sound like we are not nice people.
>
> Users with webmaster should be allowed to participate/comment in any of the
> groups.
>
> -- P
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20110603/2a215117/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the p2pu-dev
mailing list