[p2pu-dev] [Madlug] WebRTC
Philipp Schmidt
phi.schmidt at gmail.com
Fri Jun 3 08:21:23 UTC 2011
For P2PU, a browser based conferencing system would be terrific. We've
experimented with a variety of stand-alone or flash based options and there
isn't currently a great product that is open (or even free of charge) and
let's us do all the things we'd like.
BBB is probably closest, and we are hosting an experimental server at
bbb.p2pu.org - but it has some issues and would require serious effort to
integrate more fully into p2pu.org.
Fingers crossed in anticipation for the XMPP hackers out there to come up
with something new and better ... P
On 3 June 2011 00:53, Douglas Whitfield
<whitfield at opensourceplayground.org>wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 16:51, Jesse Thompson <jesse.thompson at doit.wisc.edu
> > wrote:
>
>> The reason why A/V hasn't caught on with other XMPP services is because
>> clients haven't implemented the A/V part at all, or in a way that works
>> across all clients and across all platforms. My hope is that this WebRTC
>> stuff can be leveraged by the developers of open source web-based XMPP
>> clients. If that happens, then yes, it will be a major game-changer for
>> closed networks like Skype.
>>
>
> The above is essentially where I was going with this.
>
> I didn't say this in my first message first time because I've had Skype on
> the brain with the podcast I co-host, but I was thinking web-conferencing
> more generally too - not just Skype. There are a lot of Flash
> video-conference implementations (and things like UStream) out there and I'm
> hoping this can make some of that go away.
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20110603/c12483af/attachment.html>
More information about the p2pu-dev
mailing list