[p2pu-dev] Ordering of groups - those without images come last?

Pippa Buchanan Pippa.Buchanan at gmail.com
Tue Jul 12 09:29:15 UTC 2011


http://p2pu.lighthouseapp.com/projects/71002/tickets/461-ordering-of-groups-those-without-images-come-last

http://p2pu.lighthouseapp.com/projects/71002-lernanta/tickets/464-group-completion-meter-what-are-the-required-elements-of-a-group

@alison - would love your input particularly on the second task.

http://p2pu.lighthouseapp.com/projects/71002-lernanta/tickets/465-when-group-status-changes-from-under-development-remind-users-of-a-checklist

On 11 July 2011 21:28, John Britton <public at johndbritton.com> wrote:

> Really like this stuff.
>
> @pippa - can you file as two separate tasks in lighthouse? One for sorting
> without images last and another for group completion meter with a short
> description of the parts of a group that you think make a course complete
> --
> contact info:
> http://www.johndbritton.com
> @johndbritton - http://twitter.com/johndbritton
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Stian Håklev <shaklev at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Makes total sense to me. Would even make sense to have a "percentage
>> complete thing" show up on the course page to encourage people to fill out
>> more, and list those which are more complete first... My friend was a bit
>> disappointed when she clicked on a "featured course" on the frontpage, and
>> came to a course that didn't have a long description at all, and no tasks.
>>
>> Stian
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 23:22, Pippa Buchanan <Pippa.Buchanan at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Could we set the image requirement up as a % complete type element of the
>>> course description?
>>>
>>> I wonder if when switching out of Dev Status we prompt users to read
>>> through a version of the original course checklist<http://wiki.p2pu.org/w/page/33413165/course-checklist>that;s on the wiki.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Are you ready to make your group public? Here's a last minute checklist:
>>>
>>>    - The project has a clear title.
>>>    - The project has a picture that identifies it within the P2PU site.
>>>    - The project has a clear short description.
>>>    - The project summary is concise.
>>>    - You've created some basic tasks to get participants started.
>>>    - You have some learning resources for participants to work through.
>>>
>>> Yes, I've done all these things and am happy to make my group public
>>>
>>> I'd like help finalising my group. > link to helpdesk / hand book
>>>
>>> Continue. I have faith my partially completed course will survive despite
>>> my slapdash approach"
>>>
>>>
>>> Or something like this with slightly less sarcastic wording on the last
>>> item. :-)
>>>
>>> P*
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11 July 2011 16:30, Jessica Ledbetter <jessica at jessicaledbetter.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I didn't notice that but you're right. On a side note, should we require
>>>> an image before allowing it to leave dev status?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Philipp Schmidt <philipp at p2pu.org>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11 July 2011 10:04, Pippa Buchanan <Pippa.Buchanan at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I wanted to get other people's input before I add this as a request to
>>>>>> Lighthouse.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it reasonable for us to list groups so that those without images
>>>>>> come last? I'd like to see this ordering on the SoW pages (and elsewhere) as
>>>>>> a way of identifying which groups are more complete than others.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Good idea!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In general, groups which haven't got an image are less well populated
>>>>>> with tasks and useful information than those where someone's taken the time
>>>>>> to find an image. I don't think that this a hard and fast measure but it
>>>>>> does provide a simple way of sorting groups (and making course listings look
>>>>>> more robust).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> P*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>>>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>>>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jessica Ledbetter
>>>> http://jessicaledbetter.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://reganmian.net/blog -- Random Stuff that Matters
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20110712/28de09c4/attachment.html>


More information about the p2pu-dev mailing list