[p2pu-dev] Ordering of groups - those without images come last?

[John Britton]

Really like this stuff.

@pippa - can you file as two separate tasks in lighthouse? One for sorting
without images last and another for group completion meter with a short
description of the parts of a group that you think make a course complete
--
contact info:
http://www.johndbritton.com
@johndbritton - http://twitter.com/johndbritton


On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Stian Håklev <shaklev at gmail.com> wrote:

> Makes total sense to me. Would even make sense to have a "percentage
> complete thing" show up on the course page to encourage people to fill out
> more, and list those which are more complete first... My friend was a bit
> disappointed when she clicked on a "featured course" on the frontpage, and
> came to a course that didn't have a long description at all, and no tasks.
>
> Stian
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 23:22, Pippa Buchanan <Pippa.Buchanan at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Could we set the image requirement up as a % complete type element of the
>> course description?
>>
>> I wonder if when switching out of Dev Status we prompt users to read
>> through a version of the original course checklist<http://wiki.p2pu.org/w/page/33413165/course-checklist>that;s on the wiki.
>>
>>
>> "Are you ready to make your group public? Here's a last minute checklist:
>>
>>    - The project has a clear title.
>>    - The project has a picture that identifies it within the P2PU site.
>>    - The project has a clear short description.
>>    - The project summary is concise.
>>    - You've created some basic tasks to get participants started.
>>    - You have some learning resources for participants to work through.
>>
>> Yes, I've done all these things and am happy to make my group public
>>
>> I'd like help finalising my group. > link to helpdesk / hand book
>>
>> Continue. I have faith my partially completed course will survive despite
>> my slapdash approach"
>>
>>
>> Or something like this with slightly less sarcastic wording on the last
>> item. :-)
>>
>> P*
>>
>>
>> On 11 July 2011 16:30, Jessica Ledbetter <jessica at jessicaledbetter.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I didn't notice that but you're right. On a side note, should we require
>>> an image before allowing it to leave dev status?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Philipp Schmidt <philipp at p2pu.org>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11 July 2011 10:04, Pippa Buchanan <Pippa.Buchanan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I wanted to get other people's input before I add this as a request to
>>>>> Lighthouse.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it reasonable for us to list groups so that those without images
>>>>> come last? I'd like to see this ordering on the SoW pages (and elsewhere) as
>>>>> a way of identifying which groups are more complete than others.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Good idea!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In general, groups which haven't got an image are less well populated
>>>>> with tasks and useful information than those where someone's taken the time
>>>>> to find an image. I don't think that this a hard and fast measure but it
>>>>> does provide a simple way of sorting groups (and making course listings look
>>>>> more robust).
>>>>>
>>>>> P*
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jessica Ledbetter
>>> http://jessicaledbetter.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> http://reganmian.net/blog -- Random Stuff that Matters
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20110711/8778bd46/attachment.html>