[p2pu-dev] Ordering of groups - those without images come last?

[Stian Håklev]

Makes total sense to me. Would even make sense to have a "percentage
complete thing" show up on the course page to encourage people to fill out
more, and list those which are more complete first... My friend was a bit
disappointed when she clicked on a "featured course" on the frontpage, and
came to a course that didn't have a long description at all, and no tasks.

Stian

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 23:22, Pippa Buchanan <Pippa.Buchanan at gmail.com>wrote:

> Could we set the image requirement up as a % complete type element of the
> course description?
>
> I wonder if when switching out of Dev Status we prompt users to read
> through a version of the original course checklist<http://wiki.p2pu.org/w/page/33413165/course-checklist>that;s on the wiki.
>
>
> "Are you ready to make your group public? Here's a last minute checklist:
>
>    - The project has a clear title.
>    - The project has a picture that identifies it within the P2PU site.
>    - The project has a clear short description.
>    - The project summary is concise.
>    - You've created some basic tasks to get participants started.
>    - You have some learning resources for participants to work through.
>
> Yes, I've done all these things and am happy to make my group public
>
> I'd like help finalising my group. > link to helpdesk / hand book
>
> Continue. I have faith my partially completed course will survive despite
> my slapdash approach"
>
>
> Or something like this with slightly less sarcastic wording on the last
> item. :-)
>
> P*
>
>
> On 11 July 2011 16:30, Jessica Ledbetter <jessica at jessicaledbetter.com>wrote:
>
>> I didn't notice that but you're right. On a side note, should we require
>> an image before allowing it to leave dev status?
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Philipp Schmidt <philipp at p2pu.org>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11 July 2011 10:04, Pippa Buchanan <Pippa.Buchanan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I wanted to get other people's input before I add this as a request to
>>>> Lighthouse.
>>>>
>>>> Is it reasonable for us to list groups so that those without images come
>>>> last? I'd like to see this ordering on the SoW pages (and elsewhere) as a
>>>> way of identifying which groups are more complete than others.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Good idea!
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> In general, groups which haven't got an image are less well populated
>>>> with tasks and useful information than those where someone's taken the time
>>>> to find an image. I don't think that this a hard and fast measure but it
>>>> does provide a simple way of sorting groups (and making course listings look
>>>> more robust).
>>>>
>>>> P*
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jessica Ledbetter
>> http://jessicaledbetter.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>
>


-- 
http://reganmian.net/blog -- Random Stuff that Matters
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20110711/2fb41880/attachment.html>