[p2pu-dev] Ordering of groups - those without images come last?

[Pippa Buchanan]

Could we set the image requirement up as a % complete type element of the
course description?

I wonder if when switching out of Dev Status we prompt users to read through
a version of the original course
checklist<http://wiki.p2pu.org/w/page/33413165/course-checklist>that;s
on the wiki.


"Are you ready to make your group public? Here's a last minute checklist:

   - The project has a clear title.
   - The project has a picture that identifies it within the P2PU site.
   - The project has a clear short description.
   - The project summary is concise.
   - You've created some basic tasks to get participants started.
   - You have some learning resources for participants to work through.

Yes, I've done all these things and am happy to make my group public

I'd like help finalising my group. > link to helpdesk / hand book

Continue. I have faith my partially completed course will survive despite my
slapdash approach"


Or something like this with slightly less sarcastic wording on the last
item. :-)

P*

On 11 July 2011 16:30, Jessica Ledbetter <jessica at jessicaledbetter.com>wrote:

> I didn't notice that but you're right. On a side note, should we require an
> image before allowing it to leave dev status?
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Philipp Schmidt <philipp at p2pu.org>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 11 July 2011 10:04, Pippa Buchanan <Pippa.Buchanan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I wanted to get other people's input before I add this as a request to
>>> Lighthouse.
>>>
>>> Is it reasonable for us to list groups so that those without images come
>>> last? I'd like to see this ordering on the SoW pages (and elsewhere) as a
>>> way of identifying which groups are more complete than others.
>>>
>>
>> Good idea!
>>
>>
>>>
>>> In general, groups which haven't got an image are less well populated
>>> with tasks and useful information than those where someone's taken the time
>>> to find an image. I don't think that this a hard and fast measure but it
>>> does provide a simple way of sorting groups (and making course listings look
>>> more robust).
>>>
>>> P*
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jessica Ledbetter
> http://jessicaledbetter.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20110711/4ef5943d/attachment-0001.html>