[p2pu-dev] Ordering of groups - those without images come last?

[Jessica Ledbetter]

I didn't notice that but you're right. On a side note, should we require an
image before allowing it to leave dev status?

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Philipp Schmidt <philipp at p2pu.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 11 July 2011 10:04, Pippa Buchanan <Pippa.Buchanan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I wanted to get other people's input before I add this as a request to
>> Lighthouse.
>>
>> Is it reasonable for us to list groups so that those without images come
>> last? I'd like to see this ordering on the SoW pages (and elsewhere) as a
>> way of identifying which groups are more complete than others.
>>
>
> Good idea!
>
>
>>
>> In general, groups which haven't got an image are less well populated with
>> tasks and useful information than those where someone's taken the time to
>> find an image. I don't think that this a hard and fast measure but it does
>> provide a simple way of sorting groups (and making course listings look more
>> robust).
>>
>> P*
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>
>


-- 
Jessica Ledbetter
http://jessicaledbetter.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20110711/554a9973/attachment.html>