[p2pu-dev] Ordering of groups - those without images come last?

[Philipp Schmidt]

On 11 July 2011 10:04, Pippa Buchanan <Pippa.Buchanan at gmail.com> wrote:

> I wanted to get other people's input before I add this as a request to
> Lighthouse.
>
> Is it reasonable for us to list groups so that those without images come
> last? I'd like to see this ordering on the SoW pages (and elsewhere) as a
> way of identifying which groups are more complete than others.
>

Good idea!


>
> In general, groups which haven't got an image are less well populated with
> tasks and useful information than those where someone's taken the time to
> find an image. I don't think that this a hard and fast measure but it does
> provide a simple way of sorting groups (and making course listings look more
> robust).
>
> P*
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20110711/49c192f9/attachment.html>