[p2pu-dev] Ordering of groups - those without images come last?

[Pippa Buchanan]

I wanted to get other people's input before I add this as a request to
Lighthouse.

Is it reasonable for us to list groups so that those without images come
last? I'd like to see this ordering on the SoW pages (and elsewhere) as a
way of identifying which groups are more complete than others.

In general, groups which haven't got an image are less well populated with
tasks and useful information than those where someone's taken the time to
find an image. I don't think that this a hard and fast measure but it does
provide a simple way of sorting groups (and making course listings look more
robust).

P*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20110711/d29e30b4/attachment.html>