[p2pu-dev] disscusion about lernanta's workflow on the irc
zuzel.vp
zuzel.vp at gmail.com
Sun Jan 30 06:06:26 UTC 2011
These should work:
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5217/5400092388_c6f6526368_b.jpg
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5058/5399489565_ab1fbec8fe_b.jpg
Let me kow if I am wrong.
--
Thanks,
Zuzel
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:49 PM, zuzel.vp <zuzel.vp at gmail.com> wrote:
> Please review this pull request https://github.com/p2pu/lernanta/pull/4
>
> You can see the printscreens with the changes to the UI here:
>
> * http://www.flickr.com/photos/58667883@N08/5400092388
> * http://www.flickr.com/photos/58667883@N08/5399489565
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Zuzel
>
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Jessy Kate <jessy.cowansharp at gmail.com> wrote:
>> zuzel,
>> wow, awesome! that's great! i think you captured the discussion really well,
>> and love the diagram!
>> i added a few things in. i think this will be great to keep building on and
>> as a reference, as we move forward.
>> jessy
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:53 PM, zuzel.vp <zuzel.vp at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I started working on the summary. You can see the first part here:
>>> https://github.com/p2pu/lernanta/wiki/Lernanta-Workflow and start
>>> improving it. I still have to include the parts about how to run a
>>> course, accept participants applications, decide that the course is
>>> full, start running the course (full or not), ...
>>>
>>> Marielle and Nigel:
>>>
>>> If there is a task you will prefer to work on I will said that you
>>> should go ahead (though notice that my vote is small because I am new
>>> here :D ). At least if it is a small or simple task it will not cause
>>> to many problems to duplicate work, and in fact we will be learning
>>> and then be able to review each other work. The ideal result will be
>>> that the task will be completed soon, and we will be able to produce
>>> the nice solution by seeing each others work.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>> Zuzel
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Marielle Volz <marielle.volz at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Um. So, nigelp alreadly claimed that exact n00b task on irc, about 15
>>> > minutes before I went to claim it on IRC. So I've been letting him
>>> > work on it. I think we need a better system.
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Jessy Kate
>>> > <jessy.cowansharp at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> zuzel, thanks for doing this-- and for offering to do the summary!
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:38 AM, zuzel.vp <zuzel.vp at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> http://pastie.org/1506054
>>> >>>
>>> >>> In case you want to read the long version. It will be summarized in
>>> >>> the wiki (later today).
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Thanks,
>>> >>> Zuzel
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> >>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> >>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Jessy Cowan-Sharp
>>> >> http://jessykate.com
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> >> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> >> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> > p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> > http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jessy Cowan-Sharp
>> http://jessykate.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>
>>
>
More information about the p2pu-dev
mailing list