[p2pu-dev] disscusion about lernanta's workflow on the irc

[Philipp Schmidt]

I've finally had time to look at some of this in more detail:

https://github.com/p2pu/lernanta/wiki/Lernanta-Workflow

I wonder if it's possible to start with an even simpler design to get
started. The least complex solution I can imagine.

1 - I create a group/course

2 - I manage the process of people joining me (both as co-creators or
as peer learners) over time
* anyone can join freely at any time
* people apply, and i approve/deny them
* nobody can join

3 - I collaborate with the people in the group, working through the
learning structure I created

Everything is always public

I think a lot of the complexity can be managed through good help text
and design. Adding additional features (fixed start dates that trigger
certain things to happen, cloning at various stages, public/private
options) *might* be needed later, but each additional feature creates
more structure, and it will be hard to design down again once we have
built the complexity.

P

On 29 January 2011 01:53, zuzel.vp <zuzel.vp at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I started working on the summary. You can see the first part here:
> https://github.com/p2pu/lernanta/wiki/Lernanta-Workflow and start
> improving it. I still have to include the parts about how to run a
> course, accept participants applications, decide that the course is
> full, start running the course (full or not), ...
>
> Marielle and Nigel:
>
> If there is a task you will prefer to work on I will said that you
> should go ahead (though notice that my vote is small because I am new
> here :D ). At least if it is a small or simple task it will not cause
> to many problems to duplicate work, and in fact we will be learning
> and then be able to review each other work. The ideal result will be
> that the task will be completed soon, and we will be able to produce
> the nice solution by seeing each others work.
>
> --
> Thanks,
>    Zuzel
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Marielle Volz <marielle.volz at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Um.  So, nigelp alreadly claimed that exact n00b task on irc, about 15
>> minutes before I went to claim it on IRC.  So I've been letting him
>> work on it.  I think we need a better system.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Jessy Kate <jessy.cowansharp at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> zuzel, thanks for doing this-- and for offering to do the summary!
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:38 AM, zuzel.vp <zuzel.vp at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> http://pastie.org/1506054
>>>>
>>>> In case you want to read the long version. It will be summarized in
>>>> the wiki (later today).
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>    Zuzel
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jessy Cowan-Sharp
>>> http://jessykate.com
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>