[p2pu-webcraft] [p2pu-schools] Re: Please review: default decline message for non Webcraft courses and groups

[John Britton]

I totally agree Ali, declining people is bad. They should be invited in to
Schools
--
contact info:
http://www.johndbritton.com
@johndbritton - http://twitter.com/johndbritton



On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Alison Jean Cole <
alisonjean.cole at gmail.com> wrote:

> Agree with Jessy's feedback.
>
> *My hope is that denial will be a temporary process until we have a good
> tagging system in place.*
>
> Schools could then review courses tagged with their topics and invite them
> to join the school. I would remove "select a school" from the course
> creation process and replace it with tags. That way we avoid having a
> negative system in place altogether.
>
>
> ALISON
> p2pu.org/en/alison/
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Jessy Kate Schingler <jessy at jessykate.com
> > wrote:
>
>> i think it was for p2pu as a whole. i do like the idea that people who
>> have questions could contact an individual person directly with their
>> concerns or questions.
>>
>> Jessy
>> --
>> http://jessykate.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Pippa Buchanan <Pippa.Buchanan at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> great feedback from jessy - but I accidentally deferred the message in
>>> the moderation filter. sorry jessy!
>>>
>>> switching the order of the explanation makes sense - thanks for pointing
>>> that out!
>>>
>>> re volunteer course mentors - i recall us discussing it, but it didn't go
>>> much further then that. Was this meant to be a general P2PU approach or SoW
>>> specific?  Once we've got tags in place we'll also be able to point
>>> organisers towards many other organsiers working on similar topics.
>>>
>>> P*
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Jessy Kate Schingler <jessy at jessykate.com>
>>> To: "School of Webcraft (Sow)" <p2pu-webcraft at lists.p2pu.org>
>>> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:43:49 -0400
>>> Subject: Re: [p2pu-webcraft] Please review: default decline message for
>>> non Webcraft courses and groups
>>> cool :) here's a couple thoughts:
>>>
>>> i would put the description about SoW and what differentiates it from
>>> p2pu *before* your decline statement, so that when you say, "it doesn't fit"
>>> you've already given the context for why.
>>>
>>> also when you say "let the community know" i would have a link to an
>>> individual person, as well a link to the mailing list. otherwise "community"
>>> seems a bit vague. i imagine many people won';t want to join a mailing list
>>> just to worksop their topic and if that's the only option, we might lose
>>> them, so having a human is useful IMHO.
>>>
>>> didn't we discuss the idea of having volunteer course mentors/contacts?
>>>
>>> Jessy
>>> --
>>> http://jessykate.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> p2pu-webcraft mailing list
>>>
>>> p2pu-webcraft at lists.p2pu.org
>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-webcraft
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> p2pu-webcraft mailing list
>> p2pu-webcraft at lists.p2pu.org
>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-webcraft
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-webcraft/attachments/20110622/eebeb544/attachment-0001.html>