[p2pu-dev] good free wireframing tool

John Britton john at p2pu.org
Mon Nov 21 10:45:18 UTC 2011


I didn't know that we were paying for Mockingbird. I'm using a free account
for all my stuff, don't know why we would need to pay.
--
contact info:
http://www.johndbritton.com
@johndbritton - http://twitter.com/johndbritton



On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Philipp Schmidt <philipp at p2pu.org> wrote:

> Jos' comments about openness and the collaboration features seem good
> reasons to stay with Mockingbird.
>
> Could someone using it at the moment write to them and ask if they offer a
> free option for non-profit or open-source/education projects?
>
> P
>
>
> On 21 November 2011 10:41, Chloe Varelidi <chloe at varelidi.com> wrote:
>
>> I also have been using balsamiq forever and i like it - however, the
>> collaboration element in our case of people who are not in the same space
>> is REALLY helpful and save us time.
>> i.e. we can apply feedback straight away - live design together
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Arlton Lowry <arltonlowry at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Balsamiq is a great mockup tool and actually offers more in terms of
>>> layout elements. However, it doesnt allow for group collaboration on a
>>> mockup. I would say that we should utilize both and use which ever one is
>>> right for each individual project.
>>>
>>> On Nov 19, 2011, at 8:24 AM, Jos Flores wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi guys, a completely biased comment here; as far as I know
>>> > mockingbird is built on web standards whilst balsamiq is an adobe air
>>> > app. I know not everybody is concerned about that kind of stuff but to
>>> > me it's important enough to mention it.
>>> >
>>> > The only advantage I'd see with balsamiq is that you could work
>>> > offline so depending on how you guys use it, that could be a winner.
>>> >
>>> > The free plan in mockingbird would make it perfect to use in P2PU
>>> > study groups though!
>>> >
>>> > cheers,
>>> > José
>>> >
>>> > On 19 November 2011 13:54, Nadeem Shabir <ns at talis.com> wrote:
>>> >> Ive been using balsamiq for ages it is really good. If they are
>>> offering
>>> >> free accounts we should consider trying it at least
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On 19 Nov 2011, at 11:47, Philipp Schmidt <philipp at p2pu.org> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> My friend Rufus (OKFN) told me that http://www.balsamiq.com/ offers
>>> free
>>> >> accounts for non-profits.
>>> >> I think we are currently paying for mockingbird? Worth switching?
>>> >>
>>> >> P
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> >> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> >> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> >> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> >> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> > p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> > http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Chloe Varelidi
>> http://varelidi.com/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20111121/474b975f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the p2pu-dev mailing list