[p2pu-dev] feedback on new site design ideas
shaklev at gmail.com
Wed Mar 30 12:03:03 UTC 2011
I am reading the Study Group Lighthouse page. This was mentioned in the blog
post as well. I still don't quite understand exactly the difference from the
old course model - how much of this is a different philosophy / different
technological implementation, and how much is a new terminology? For someone
who thought he was planning to run a course, and now has to run a study
group, in a few weeks, this is pretty important. Could you specify exactly
what is different from the old "courses"?
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:18, Philipp Schmidt <phi.schmidt at gmail.com>wrote:
> We posted an general update about the development of our new site to
> the blog today:
> We also want to get more feedback and input to the design ideas for
> the prototype (keeping in mind that this is a "minimal viable product"
> - not the long-term full fledged site) and the bigger ideas for the
> In the last few weeks, we held two technology design meetings (in
> Toronto, and San Francisco) to come up with a high-level roadmap for
> the new site. We created wireframes with more detailed descriptions of
> the features we intend to build for the prototype. Please submit your
> comments directly in lighthouse, or post here to discuss.
> * Study Group Home Page --
> * Schools Home Page --
> * Task Page --
> * Sign-up Task:
> Best - P
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
http://reganmian.net/blog -- Random Stuff that Matters
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the p2pu-dev