[p2pu-dev] another argument for a "webmaster" group

[John Britton]

Instead of creating a webmaster role, what is stopping us from allowing
people who aren't group members comment? Instead of adding another feature,
why not simplify?
--
contact info:
http://www.johndbritton.com
@johndbritton - http://twitter.com/johndbritton


On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Alison Jean Cole <alisonjean.cole at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Webmaster roles to post comments in all groups would be crucial to my end
> of the work as well. WOuld love ot implement this. Zuzel, I have an inkling
> there may be a ticket for this already?
>
> ALISON
> new.p2pu.org/en/alison/ <http://p2pu.org/users/alison>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Philipp Schmidt <phi.schmidt at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 3 June 2011 16:29, Jessica Ledbetter <jessica at jessicaledbetter.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Maybe people assume if it's web-related, it goes under SoW. I think we
>>> have new code incoming 0.7 that has an approval process. I saw some
>>> placeholders for it anyway. Zuzel can clarify :)
>>>
>>
>> Yes - please send a separate email about this feature to the list. This is
>> something that people (incl. myself) feel strongly about and would be good
>> to discuss before we roll out.
>>
>> -- P
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20110603/ddf3f470/attachment-0001.html>