[p2pu-dev] attachments/uploads?

Rebecca Kahn bekka.kahn at gmail.com
Wed Jun 1 14:34:46 UTC 2011


+1 for Jessica.
Also, it does make things a bit more complicated in terms of copyright if we
allow for uploads.

That said, it was something that came up quite a few times on the old site -
organisers did want to upload various materials.
Would it be really hard to (and this is a non-tecchie asking so forgive me)
make a thumbnail appear alongside a link, like it does on Facebook? Visually
a bit more interesting than just a hyperlink...

B

On 1 June 2011 15:30, Jessica Ledbetter <jessica at jessicaledbetter.com>wrote:

> I'm not sure of the timeline.
>
> One of the good things about storing videos offsite is that people might
> find them and follow them to the course on P2PU :) Would be nice to
> integrate things more tightly though and not worry if something moves or
> someone closes his/her account on youtube.
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:12 AM, James Tatum <jtatum at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 for S3 (although it's not a CDN :)
>>
>> Linodes are great but the disk resources are their biggest weakness. One
>> thing that will be tricky about the proposed solution is development. We'll
>> have to work our backing store model so that devs can use either local
>> storage or S3 for development.
>>
>> I see there is at least one library that does this kind of abstraction.
>> django-filetransfers (which does async S3, that's important). With that it
>> seems we'll be able to pick a storage engine in settings.py, which would
>> rock.
>>
>>
>> On May 31, 2011, at 8:15 PM, John Britton wrote:
>>
>> Once we start accepting uploads we'll have to deal with limitations (size,
>> filetype, etc) because hosting the files might prove to be technically
>> challenging (bandwidth, storage). One possible solution would be to use a
>> CDN (like Amazon S3) for uploaded files.
>> --
>> contact info:
>> http://www.johndbritton.com
>> @johndbritton - http://twitter.com/johndbritton
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Jessy Kate Schingler <
>> jessy at jessykate.com> wrote:
>>
>>> hey guys,
>>>
>>> what's the current thinking on the dev timeline for supporting uploads or
>>> attachments? this seems useful not just as an option for participants to
>>> host stuff, but also important for re-usability of courses. right now i can
>>> point to a url but not attach.
>>>
>>> thoughts?
>>>
>>> Jessy
>>> --
>>> http://jessykate.com
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jessica Ledbetter
> http://jessicaledbetter.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>
>


-- 
Rebecca Kahn
Skype: rebekahn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20110601/c7c9894d/attachment.html>


More information about the p2pu-dev mailing list