[p2pu-dev] disscusion about lernanta's workflow on the irc
philipp at p2pu.org
Thu Feb 3 09:36:46 UTC 2011
I've finally had time to look at some of this in more detail:
I wonder if it's possible to start with an even simpler design to get
started. The least complex solution I can imagine.
1 - I create a group/course
2 - I manage the process of people joining me (both as co-creators or
as peer learners) over time
* anyone can join freely at any time
* people apply, and i approve/deny them
* nobody can join
3 - I collaborate with the people in the group, working through the
learning structure I created
Everything is always public
I think a lot of the complexity can be managed through good help text
and design. Adding additional features (fixed start dates that trigger
certain things to happen, cloning at various stages, public/private
options) *might* be needed later, but each additional feature creates
more structure, and it will be hard to design down again once we have
built the complexity.
On 29 January 2011 01:53, zuzel.vp <zuzel.vp at gmail.com> wrote:
> I started working on the summary. You can see the first part here:
> https://github.com/p2pu/lernanta/wiki/Lernanta-Workflow and start
> improving it. I still have to include the parts about how to run a
> course, accept participants applications, decide that the course is
> full, start running the course (full or not), ...
> Marielle and Nigel:
> If there is a task you will prefer to work on I will said that you
> should go ahead (though notice that my vote is small because I am new
> here :D ). At least if it is a small or simple task it will not cause
> to many problems to duplicate work, and in fact we will be learning
> and then be able to review each other work. The ideal result will be
> that the task will be completed soon, and we will be able to produce
> the nice solution by seeing each others work.
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Marielle Volz <marielle.volz at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Um. So, nigelp alreadly claimed that exact n00b task on irc, about 15
>> minutes before I went to claim it on IRC. So I've been letting him
>> work on it. I think we need a better system.
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Jessy Kate <jessy.cowansharp at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> zuzel, thanks for doing this-- and for offering to do the summary!
>>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:38 AM, zuzel.vp <zuzel.vp at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> In case you want to read the long version. It will be summarized in
>>>> the wiki (later today).
>>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>>> Jessy Cowan-Sharp
>>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
>> p2pu-dev mailing list
>> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
More information about the p2pu-dev