[p2pu-dev] Spam policy for the new site.

[Jessica Ledbetter]

I really appreciate constructive criticism but I feel the below is going too
far, Dan.

I just checked and found at least one ticket on embedding:
http://p2pu.lighthouseapp.com/projects/71002/tickets/9-kind-of-content-that-we-can-display
 I
really feel the community, including, developers, are doing the best they/we
can.


And re: spam policy, that's a great question, Zuzel. I guess we can be more
lenient during beta cause we're probably going to make mistakes. But I think
we need one definitely. Maybe in the future when someone wants to test, he
or she should let at least you know before doing so on sites in production.

~Jessica, a volunteer

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Dan Diebolt <dandiebolt at gmail.com> wrote:

> Patches to what? You have more holes than swiss cheese security wise among
> {new, www, wiki} and I will just keep my mouth shut if
> practical solutions are going to be met with implied threats of being
> "deactivated" or refusal to implement a 10 minute simple solution. If you
> are referring to allowing the CKEditor to allow <iframe> I would not
> characterize this as a patch since it is just a configuration issue of the
> editor. The guys over at Canvas don't have this imaginary issue with
> <iframe>s
>
> http://canvas.instructure.com/courses/31847/modules
>
> <http://canvas.instructure.com/courses/31847/modules>
>

-- 
Jessica Ledbetter
http://jessicaledbetter.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20110414/732a5880/attachment.html>