[p2pu-dev] github issue tracker

[Jessy Kate Schingler]

thanks for the comparison zuzel. i agree we've been changing a lot and
wouldn't prioritize moving now.

when you say non-members do you mean people without accounts at all (ie not
signed in) or just people who don't explicitly have a role in the
lighthouse/github project?

non-logged-in members' ability to report bugs and add feature requests is
important IMHO, though we could use uservoice for that.

--
jessykate.com

** Please note my new email in your address books: jessy at jessykate.com **




On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Philipp Schmidt <philipp at p2pu.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 13 April 2011 11:07, Pippa Buchanan <Pippa.Buchanan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I really like Lighthouse and have only just got into the flow of using it
>> to add tickets (possibly I've added 20 of the 99 open tickets :-)), but can
>> see that github would have great benefits for the tech group.
>>
>> In the case of the tech project moving to github, would we still use
>> Lighthouse as the tracker for non-tech tasks? Or, could we potentially
>> revert to Open Atrium (tracker.p2pu.org) for non-tech tasks if the tech
>> project moves to github?
>>
>
> Different groups can use different tools. And from Zuzel's first email it
> sounds like we are NOT moving at least for now ;-) P
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2pu-dev mailing list
> p2pu-dev at lists.p2pu.org
> http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.p2pu.org/pipermail/p2pu-dev/attachments/20110413/286115f3/attachment.html>